01 / Referrals
Keep referrals inside the network.
Fewer referrals to providers who have left or changed location, and less referral leakage.
Used for
- Member-to-provider assignment
- Network participation
- Referral routing
- Provider directory accuracy
Who we serve › Provider organizations
Patient identity and provider data management are sold separately. The gap between them is where referrals leak, quality suffers, and claims are rejected. Gaine resolves both — and the relationship between them.
For provider organizations: Gaine HDMP, an operational health data management platform, resolves providers, patients, locations, networks and the relationships between them across the systems you run now, then delivers reconciled change to the systems that need to act on it.
Where this stops
One roster, one month
A physician organization manages a provider network for several health plans. Each month, delegated medical groups send it their rosters, and it sends a roster to every plan.
A delegated medical group sends its monthly roster. Names arrive as “Last, First” in one field, with no NPI and no license.
Without a reliable way to link the roster to the provider master file, the roster must be reviewed manually, as it is every month.
The manual review is still not complete, so the roster is blindly sent to the health plan to meet the contractual commitment.
A member assigned to a physician on the roster, but the physician has left the group, now creates an out-of-network claim.
OutcomeProvider network reporting requirements are impossible to fulfill in a manual process, thus leading to billing disputes.
Client: Delegated roster
The group’s file lands by secure file transfer, as it does today. Nothing changes for the group.
Roster to HDMP
Each provider is matched to the provider master by name, address and reference data. Missing NPIs and licenses are added from NPPES and the state licensing board.
No client activity
Gaine HDMP internal
Providers already in the master match automatically. Those that don’t are flagged, together with the members assigned to them.
Client: Provider data team
The team reviews only the flagged providers, not the whole file, and confirms which have left.
HDMP to Stewarding queue
Each flagged provider arrives with the members assigned to them and where each value came from.
Client: Network team
Reassigns the 110 members to an active physician at the same location, in its own system.
Network team to HDMP to Health plan rosters
The next roster to each plan carries the corrected assignments. The referral system is sent the same change.
OutcomeThe roster each plan receives matches the providers who are actually there.
Illustrative. Each system connects the way it allows, so how far each one aligns differs.
One gap, four symptoms
Referrals, rosters, onboarding and claims each fail for the same reason: the provider record and the patients attached to it disagree from one system to the next.
01 / Referrals
Fewer referrals to providers who have left or changed location, and less referral leakage.
Used for
02 / Rosters
Less manual review of delegated rosters, fewer roster rejections, and directory requirements met.
Used for
03 / Onboarding
Shorter time from credentialing approval to a provider who can be scheduled and billed.
Used for
04 / Claims
Fewer denials and claims edits caused by provider, location and taxonomy mismatches.
Used for
Proof
A physician-services organization managing roughly 10,000 providers and 50+ health plan rosters a month. None of its delegated groups’ rosters matched its provider master on provider name, so every file was reviewed by hand, every month.
In all three rosters. Two carried no NPI or license at all.
Every provider already in the master, with no manual matching.
Not in the master. Missing identifiers were added from NPPES and the state board.
Patients the organization could now reassign.
Measured on the organization’s own files. Clients are not named, due to confidentiality agreements.
IDC MarketScape: U.S. Healthcare Data Platform for Providers 2024–2025Major Player
Twenty owners, one record
Credentialing, the EHR, scheduling, HR, directories, referrals, claims and every delegated group own part of the answer. They keep their systems. Gaine keeps them aligned.
stays the master of identity. Gaine takes its identifiers and masters the data around them.
keep running the work, and each team continues to make independent decisions on what updates to accept.
keeps the analysis. Gaine publishes governed records to it, one way, as they change.
Questions
No. Credentialing stays the verified source for what it verifies. Gaine treats it as one source among several and keeps its results aligned with rosters, directories, referrals and claims.
No, you control updates to your EHR. Gaine reads from it, and sends reconciled change files that your team applies through its own change control.
Each provider on a delegated group’s roster is matched to your provider master, missing identifiers are added from NPPES and the state licensing board, and providers who are not in the master are flagged with the members assigned to them.
You do. Conflicts where both values are defensible still need your decision. Gaine makes them visible, actionable and auditable.